Thursday, January 10, 2008

The Wire

Wasting From the Inside
By M.A. Fedeli



"It's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it."
-George Carlin

The fifth and final season of The Wire on HBO has begun. And not since The Sopranos has so much print space been dedicated to hailing a television show as the best on TV. Whatever The Wire is, it is certainly the most thoughtful and intelligent drama on television. Beyond that, however, it is the most patiently well-crafted storytelling the tube has seen in a while. It is the closest thing to reading a classic epic novel that you will find on TV. The plotting is restrained, the characters are not indulgent, and the storylines are just as faithful to reality as they are to entertainment; a massive achievement in this day and age and an aspect that may go a long way to explaining why The Wire (along with its Baltimore location) does not have huge ratings by any standard.

What The Sopranos says about the soul; what Six Feet Under says about coping; what Sex in the City says about, well, sex in the city, The Wire says about the almost complete erosion of the American Dream. The Dream, sometimes defined as the ability of anyone to achieve prosperity with hard-work, has been supplanted over the years with the thought that everyone in this country is owed prosperity, hard-worker or not. It is in this spirit that we find The Wire: examining the American sense of entitlement that contributes to much violence, corruption, and crime in this country; examining the grinding wheels that have ground to a halt -- the contingency plan supposed to protect us from the worst we have to offer. The Wire does not stop there with it's blame, however. Unlike most "cop" shows or "lawyer" shows or "crime" shows or "political" shows, The Wire deftly hands out blame to all aspects of our culture, our institutions, and ourselves.

The show prides itself on the crisp thematic divisions of its seasons. Each season even comes with a new credit sequence and a newly recorded version of the theme song. The new credit sequences reflect the pertaining season as a whole, mirroring the subject matter and trajectory and offering small clues to the season's progression that don't become apparent until you experience them in the episodes. The Wire's police and thieves saga has 5 chapters: Among other things, Season 1 deals with detectives and drug dealers; Season 2 adds on unions, dock workers, and international crime; Season 3's additions include neighborhood and institutional breakdown, city government and political corruption; Season 4 garnered unmatched reviews with its inclusion of the educational system, inner-city children, and family.

From all signs, Season 5 will be dealing with all of the same and bringing the media into the fray, specifically city newspapers. More specifically, The Baltimore Sun, where show creator David Simon worked for years until he was fed up with the ineffectualness of journalism. He explains, "One of the sad things about contemporary journalism is that it actually matters very little. The world now is almost inured to the power of journalism. The best journalism would manage to outrage people. And people are less and less inclined to outrage."

From the looks of the first couple episodes, weariness and defeat seem to also ready to play a big role. Simon explains, "The Wire's basically about the end of an empire. It's about, This is as much of America as we've paid for. No more, no less. We didn't pay for a New Orleans that's protected from floods the way, say, the Netherlands is. The police department gets what it pays for, the city government gets what it pays for, the school system gets what it pays for. And in the last season, the people who are supposed to be holding the entire thing to some form of public standard, they get what they pay for."

You can't constantly lower taxes and expect to get the same level of public services. You can't fight a trillion dollar war and expect other aspects of the government not to suffer. Politicians are afraid to ask for our sacrifice because they are afraid of us! How many of us would vote for a candidate if they told us taxes would have to be raised 5 to 10 percent for programs that may never directly affect us? Maybe years ago a majority would be open to such an idea, as we sacrificed greatly during WWII, but most in this country have been programed by the panderers since to believe that taxes are already to high; that government is already too big. And what of the media, the guardians of the public mind, the ones who are supposed to keep balance? They are marginalized by capitalism, technology, and the magic of "access": If you roast your subject, your subject will no longer grant you access, your stories will lack exclusivity, you wont be as successful, you make less money, and etc. and etc. and etc.

The system has worked itself into a corner. After the 60's, politicians learned exactly how far they could push people and exactly how far people would be willing to push back: not very far. No amount of realistic public demonstration will sway much in the halls of power. Even if you were to amass an imposing sized group (say, the amount of people who vote for American Idol) the same amount of people would automatically stand against you. Why? Just because. This is the absolute backlash of playing red state and blue state against each other; it's re-fighting the Civil War in the land of non-thinking while the generals hide behind desks. The American system of government has been at work for less than 250 years. As time goes by, those at the helm have learned how to better grease the rails for their own devises and how to spin it all so there is little repercussion. Each day that goes by is one more day on the job where they learn how to perfect their routine; where they see how far the thing bends before it breaks; how much shit we'll eat. The standards and expectations have crashed through the floor; it's every man for himself.

Only one example is really needed: just look at what our President has been able to get away with, look at how far he's been able to push his own, unconstitutional agenda. Brazenly he has done things that no one thought could be done within our system of checks and balances. And look, he is still President and still defended. The best thing George W. Bush has done for this country is show us just how broken the machine really is. We may actually, hopefully, wind up thanking him for opening our eyes to that in the long run. But probably not.

The castle is collapsing and The Wire is giving us a view from the inside. It's credibility is ensured because it passes out the blame equally to all who deserve it. Simon's view seems to be that we all deserve it. And of course we do, and we all know it. Don't we?


5 comments:

ellie said...

you bring up an interesting point with the growing sense of entitlement among americans. from a beginning grounded in rugged individualism, we've grown rather soft, haven't we--both physically and mentally? mine is just another voice in the chorus lamenting our poor nutrition and declining test scores; it's no secret that we've become less a country of pioneers than one of lazy couch-tards.

i do, however, question your indictment of the media as marginalized by 'access'--at least in the sense that you define it. these days, everyone has access, in excess. i'm surprised you think journalists are afraid to be harsh--maybe on network television, but from op-eds in the major papers, to individuals' blogs, everyone's got a platform they're not afraid to jump on & shout from. perhaps it's more bark than bite--but that's our endemic laziness coming through. there are myriad websites devoted to the stories 'mainstream media' hasn't covered sufficiently, but even the best of these get overwhelmed by not necessarily a bigger fish, but the giant wave that is modern media. TOO. MUCH. INFORMATION.

i guess what's a bit unclear to me is what happened after the 60s, when the civil rights movement demonstrated the power of a concentrated population to make a difference.

this is why i can't stand discussing politics. tons of negativity, a modicum of mediocre satire, and yet no one's got anything really inspiring to say. that's what happened to the american dream; laziness, deprecating humor, and a jaded population.

i think we've become passive at a rate that correlates to the ease with which 'access' is granted. even if we're audibly complaining, what are we actively doing? well, mr. fedeli? are you just going to sit there and COMMENT?

Mark A. Fedeli said...

E-balls: you make very good points about the media but i dont think they conflict with mine. by access i dont mean access to a platform, i mean access to the newsmakers themselves; the president, etc.

access is sold now, not earned. and i am only discussing the mainstream media sources (major newspapers) that appear in the show. along with major news magazines and news programs, they suffer from being ratings addicted. access equals ratings/circulation. sure, someone can give their opinion all they want in an op-ed or blog and open up some eyes, maybe shed some light. but if you cant get the head honcho to give his opinion, to get him in a corner and force out some real answers, well, what good is it to your editor in getting the edge on the other 3 papers in your city?

you need access for that. ask the tough questions, and you dont get no access.

true, everyone has a platform now, but no one has any access. those who do have access are vanilla and safe. the questions are pre-screened. politicians will not go into any interview that will actually roast them, like Houses of Lords and Commons did so well to Tony Blair.

and you're right, there is (and probably should be) tons of negativity among the general public regarding politics. not because the US is a failure or incompetent. but because the US is becoming that pitiful giant Nixon warned against. to have the resources we have and NOT be Reagan's "shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere" is the true crime. we could have done it, we had the head start, and we all allowed it not to happen.

all we learned with 60's idealism is that all the idealism in the world wont save you from martial law, capitalism, determined politicians, and a complicit media.

and why are they complicit? because if they aren't, they dont get no access.

care to COMMENT?

ellie said...

for lack of a counter argument (as you've pointed out, we more or less agree), i direct you to supplemental material/food for thought:

http://www.sacbee.com/107/v-print/story/634053.html

this is an interview with 91 year old NPR reporter daniel schorr. he's a bit cantankerous, in that "i wish i could buy him a whiskey at some hell's kitchen dive circa 1962 & then listen to him kvetch" kind of way. enjoy.

and oh god. did i really just use the word 'kvetch'?

Mark A. Fedeli said...

that man is incredible. excellent article. he reminds me of Studs Terkel.

Anonymous said...

I love sex and the city :)